PlayDecoded
Menu

MLB Model vs Market Disagreements

MLB games where our model gives a team a clearly higher win probability than the betting market does. Showing gaps of 5 points or more.

3 MLB games where the model and market disagree
MLBTue, Oct 6 at 12:00 AM
NYY at TB
Model favors TB
TB win chance
66%model46%market
20-point disagreement
ModelMarket (no vig)
MLBMon, Oct 5 at 12:00 AM
ATL at LAD
Model favors LAD
LAD win chance
76%model58%market
18-point disagreement
ModelMarket (no vig)
MLBMon, Oct 5 at 9:00 PM
CWS at CLE
Model favors CLE
CLE win chance
64%model59%market
5-point disagreement
ModelMarket (no vig)

How we measure a disagreement

For every game our model gives each team a win probability. The betting market gives one too, hidden inside the odds. When the two numbers are far apart, that's a disagreement. Say the model makes the home team 60% to win and the market works out to 52%. That's an 8-point disagreement, and it's how we rank MLB games on this page.

We take the sportsbook's margin (the “vig”) out of the odds first, so we compare the model with a fair market number, not a price padded in the book's favor. The implied probability explainer walks through that math with a worked example.

What a disagreement does and doesn't tell you

It tells you the model reads the game differently from the market. It doesn't tell you who wins. A team at 60% still loses 4 games in 10, and the market is often right when the two split. We publish how the model's numbers hold up on the accuracy page, down to which probability ranges it over- and under-shoots. The methodology page shows the factors behind every number, so you can check the reasoning yourself.

Model outputs are for informational purposes only. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

See our model accuracy page for transparent performance data.